Amazon | Talmudic Deontic Logic | Abraham, Michael, Gabbay,31gc6vUvPdL.jpg,LM25119EVAL Evaluation board | TI.com,Amazon.com: Logic: A History of its Central Concepts, Vol,Fundamentals of Logic Locking | SpringerLink,
Talmudic Deontic Logic
タルムード義務論
発売日2010-08-27T00:00:01Z メーカーCollege Publications 人物Abraham, Michael アブラハム、マイケル
ASIN: 184890018X JAN: 9781848900189
大きなダメージ無く良いです。洋書 英語版 A Primer for Child Psychotherapists Diana Siskind 中古 児童 心理療法士 心理学 カウンセリング 精神医学。
本の概要 In this book we study the Deontic Logic of the Talmud. We find the system is different from the formal deontic logical system currently used in the general scientific community, both in its ethical aspects as well as in its legal aspects. We show that the Talmudic distinctions between Obligations and Prohibitions are not based on the manner of execution of actions (positive action or lack of action) and offer a suitable model for such distinctions. Our model distinguishes between the normative and practical aspects of the Talmudic legal and ethical argumentation and discusses several applications and clarifications to current so called paradoxes of Deontic Logic as related to Contrary to Duties and to legal and ethical practical decision maki
タルムード義務論
発売日2010-08-27T00:00:01Z
メーカーCollege Publications
人物Abraham, Michael
アブラハム、マイケル
ASIN: 184890018X
JAN: 9781848900189
大きなダメージ無く良いです。洋書 英語版 A Primer for Child Psychotherapists Diana Siskind 中古 児童 心理療法士 心理学 カウンセリング 精神医学。
本の概要
In this book we study the Deontic Logic of the Talmud. We find the system is different from the formal deontic logical system currently used in the general scientific community, both in its ethical aspects as well as in its legal aspects. We show that the Talmudic distinctions between Obligations and Prohibitions are not based on the manner of execution of actions (positive action or lack of action) and offer a suitable model for such distinctions. Our model distinguishes between the normative and practical aspects of the Talmudic legal and ethical argumentation and discusses several applications and clarifications to current so called paradoxes of Deontic Logic as related to Contrary to Duties and to legal and ethical practical decision maki